bitkoban - regulation news

Regulation News

Crypto Tax India Crackdown: CBDT Sends Notices to Thousands for Undeclared Income
The post Crypto Tax India Crackdown: CBDT Sends Notices to Thousands for Undeclared Income appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News India’s Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has initiated a large-scale investigation into individuals and entities who failed to report income from Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs), including cryptocurrencies . What Happened? The CBDT has identified widespread non-compliance related to crypto income and has sent notices via email, asking recipients to update their Income Tax Returns (ITRs). “The department has recently sent emails to thousands of defaulting persons to review their ITR and update it if any income on account of VDA (Virtual Digital Asset) transactions has not been properly declared,” a senior CBDT official confirmed . The undeclared income violates provisions under the Income Tax Act, 1961 and is now under close scrutiny. Why CBDT Launched This Probe This enforcement action is part of CBDT’s NUDGE initiative (Non-Intrusive Usage of Data to Guide and Enable) under Section 80GGC. The focus is to detect tax evasion and money laundering in crypto activities. Key triggers for the crackdown include: Large crypto trades not matched with income disclosures Use of undisclosed offshore wallets Crypto profits converted into cash with no tax reporting Lack of foreign asset declaration by traders This action aligns with the Indian government’s efforts to bring transparency to the digital asset ecosystem and combat financial crimes involving crypto. .article-inside-link { margin-left: 0 !important; border: 1px solid #0052CC4D; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; padding: 10px 0; text-align: left; } .entry ul.article-inside-link li { font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; font-weight: 600; list-style-type: none; margin-bottom: 0; display: inline-block; } .entry ul.article-inside-link li:last-child { display: none; } Also Read : Crypto Market Faces $190M Liquidation—But Signs Hint at Upcoming Rally , What Crypto Investors Need to Do If you’ve received a notice or believe your crypto income is not properly declared, take the following steps: Review your past ITRs for any undeclared crypto gains Gather records of all VDA transactions File an updated return using ITR-U under Section 139(8A) Declare crypto income separately from other capital gains for clarity Timely compliance can help avoid penalties and formal investigations. What’s Next? The CBDT has made it clear that this is a final reminder. Those who fail to respond to the notice may be subjected to verification or in-depth scrutiny . “Those who fail to respond to the nudge may be picked for verification or scrutiny,” CBDT warned. This action signals a stricter enforcement environment for crypto users in India. As virtual assets grow in popularity, the tax department is stepping up efforts to ensure transparency and legal compliance. .article_register_shortcode { padding: 18px 24px; border-radius: 8px; display: flex; align-items: center; margin: 6px 0 22px; border: 1px solid #0052CC4D; background: linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1) 0%, rgba(0, 82, 204, 0.1) 100%); } .article_register_shortcode .media-body h5 { color: #000000; font-weight: 600; font-size: 20px; line-height: 22px; text-align:left; } .article_register_shortcode .media-body h5 span { color: #0052CC; } .article_register_shortcode .media-body p { font-weight: 400; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; color: #171717B2; margin-top: 4px; text-align:left; } .article_register_shortcode .media-body{ padding-right: 14px; } .article_register_shortcode .media-button a { float: right; } .article_register_shortcode .primary-button img{ vertical-align: middle; width: 20px; margin: 0; display: inline-block; } @media (min-width: 581px) and (max-width: 991px) { .article_register_shortcode .media-body p { margin-bottom: 0; } } @media (max-width: 580px) { .article_register_shortcode { display: block; padding: 20px; } .article_register_shortcode img { max-width: 50px; } .article_register_shortcode .media-body h5 { font-size: 16px; } .article_register_shortcode .media-body { margin-left: 0px; } .article_register_shortcode .media-body p { font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px; margin-top: 6px; margin-bottom: 14px; } .article_register_shortcode .media-button a { float: unset; } .article_register_shortcode .secondary-button { margin-bottom: 0; } } Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World! Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more. .subscription-options li { display: none; } .research-report-subscribe{ background-color: #0052CC; padding: 12px 20px; border-radius: 8px; color: #fff; font-weight: 500; font-size: 14px; width: 96%; } .research-report-subscribe img{ vertical-align: sub; margin-right: 2px; } Subscribe to News var templateIds = "6"; var listOfSubscribed = []; function subscribed_popupmodal(template_id) { var templateId = '6'; getAllSubscriberCategoryList([templateId]); var subcribemodal = window.parent.document.getElementById('subscribe-modal-design'); if (subcribemodal) { var modalContent = ` Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World! Stay informed and gain the edge you need to navigate the crypto world. Select your subscription now Daily Get real-time crypto news, market insights, and blockchain updates. Weekly Stay updated with major trends, funding news, and price analysis. Monthly Receive a detailed report with market analysis and expert predictions. Subscribe Now `; subcribemodal.innerHTML = modalContent; } subscribe_unsubscribe_status(template_id); //getAllSubscriberCategoryList(template_id); } function toggleSubscription(subscription, template_id) { var subscriptionCheckbox = document.getElementById(subscription + '_' + template_id); var li = document.getElementById(subscription + 'Selected_' + template_id); if (subscriptionCheckbox.checked) { li.classList.add('active'); } else { li.classList.remove('active'); } } function getAllSubscriberCategoryList(getcategoryId) { jQuery.ajax({ url: 'https://coinpedia.org/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php', type: 'GET', data: { action: 'subscribe_api_ajax_request', apiurl: '/app/email_newsletter/list', }, success: function(response) { var result = JSON.parse(response.message); if (result.status === true) { var idstosubscribed = [] // Populate listOfSubscribed with subscribed category IDs result.message.forEach(listofcategory => { if (listofcategory.subscribe_status === 1) { if (!listOfSubscribed.includes(listofcategory._id)) { listOfSubscribed.push(listofcategory._id); } if (!idstosubscribed.includes(listofcategory.news_cp_category_row_id)) { idstosubscribed.push(listofcategory.news_cp_category_row_id); } } }); idstosubscribed.forEach(id => { var subscribeButton = document.getElementById('subscribe_' + id); var unsubscribeButton = document.getElementById('unsubscribe_' + id); if (subscribeButton && unsubscribeButton) { subscribeButton.style.display = 'none'; unsubscribeButton.style.display = 'block'; var showDownloadReport = document.getElementById('download_report'); if (showDownloadReport) { showDownloadReport.style.display = 'block'; } } }); } }, error: function(xhr, status, error) { console.error('Error:', error); } }); } function subscribe_unsubscribe_status(getcategoryId) { var elementTounsubscribe = parent.document.getElementById('unsubscribe_' + getcategoryId); var elementTosubscribe = parent.document.getElementById('subscribe_' + getcategoryId); jQuery.ajax({ url: 'https://coinpedia.org/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php', type: 'POST', data: { action: 'subscribe_api_ajax_request', apiurl: '/app/email_newsletter/list?category_row_id=' + getcategoryId, }, success: function(response) { var result = JSON.parse(response.message); if (result.status === true) { parent.jQuery('.skeliton-loader-block').hide(); var hasSubscribeStatusOne = false; result.message.forEach(subscribeStatus => { if (listOfSubscribed.includes(subscribeStatus._id) && subscribeStatus.subscribe_status === 1) { hasSubscribeStatusOne = true; } if (subscribeStatus.notification_type === 3) { parent.document.getElementById('monthlySelected_' + getcategoryId).style.display = 'block'; parent.document.getElementById('monthly_' + getcategoryId).setAttribute('data-id', subscribeStatus._id); if (subscribeStatus.subscribe_status === 1) { parent.document.getElementById('monthly_' + getcategoryId).checked = true; } } else if (subscribeStatus.notification_type === 2) { parent.document.getElementById('weeklySelected_' + getcategoryId).style.display = 'block'; parent.document.getElementById('weekly_' + getcategoryId).setAttribute('data-id', subscribeStatus._id); if (subscribeStatus.subscribe_status === 1) { parent.document.getElementById('weekly_' + getcategoryId).checked = true; } } else if (subscribeStatus.notification_type === 1) { parent.document.getElementById('dailySelected_' + getcategoryId).style.display = 'block'; parent.document.getElementById('daily_' + getcategoryId).setAttribute('data-id', subscribeStatus._id); if (subscribeStatus.subscribe_status === 1) { parent.document.getElementById('daily_' + getcategoryId).checked = true; } } if (subscribeStatus.subscribe_status === 1) { listOfSubscribed.push(subscribeStatus._id); } }); if (hasSubscribeStatusOne) { elementTosubscribe.style.display = 'none'; elementTounsubscribe.style.display = 'block'; } else { elementTosubscribe.style.display = 'block'; elementTounsubscribe.style.display = 'none'; } } }, error: function(xhr, status, error) { console.error('Error:', error); } }); } function logSelectedSubscriptions(categoryid) { var unsubscribemodal = document.querySelector('.unsubscribed-popup-modal .modal'); var subscribedmodal = document.querySelector('.subscribed-popup-modal .modal'); unsubscribemodal.innerHTML=''; subscribedmodal.innerHTML=''; var selectedSubscriptions = []; var storeCheckedId = []; var checkboxes = document.querySelectorAll('#subscription-options-' + categoryid + ' input[type="checkbox"]'); var errorMessage = document.getElementById('error-message-select'); // Use a Set to handle unique data-ids var uniqueSubscribedIds = new Set(listOfSubscribed); checkboxes.forEach(function(checkbox) { var dataId = parseInt(checkbox.getAttribute('data-id')); if (checkbox.checked) { selectedSubscriptions.push(checkbox.id); storeCheckedId.push(dataId); } else { uniqueSubscribedIds.delete(dataId); // Remove unchecked data-id } }); // Update listOfSubscribed with unique values listOfSubscribed = Array.from(uniqueSubscribedIds); var selectedSubscriptionsString = selectedSubscriptions.join(', '); var concatinateSubscribeId = [...new Set(storeCheckedId.concat(listOfSubscribed))]; var categoryData = { 'subscribed_categories': concatinateSubscribeId }; var requestSubscriberData = { action: 'handle_dynamic_api_request_with_headers', security: '4afce05d3d', endpoint: '/app/email_newsletter/update_categories', token: '', data: categoryData }; jQuery.ajax({ url: 'https://coinpedia.org/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php', type: 'POST', data: requestSubscriberData, beforeSend: function(xhr) { xhr.setRequestHeader('X-Requested-With', 'XMLHttpRequest'); }, success: function(response) { try { response = response.data; if (storeCheckedId.length === 0) { var unsubcribedPopUpmodal = ` You’ve Unsubscribed Successfully We're sorry to see you go! Your subscription has been canceled. If you change your mind, you can re-subscribe anytime. Thank you for being part of our community! `; unsubscribemodal.innerHTML = unsubcribedPopUpmodal; document.querySelector('#subscribe-modal-design .modal').style.display = 'none'; unsubscribemodal.style.display = 'block'; unsubscribemodal.classList.remove('hide'); unsubscribemodal.classList.add('show'); document.getElementById('subscribe_' + categoryid).style.display = 'block'; document.getElementById('unsubscribe_' + categoryid).style.display = 'none'; var showDownloadReport = document.getElementById('download_report'); if (showDownloadReport) { showDownloadReport.style.display = 'none'; } } else { var subscribedPopupModal = ` Thank you for subscribing! Thank you for subscribing to our crypto and blockchain newsletter! You’ll now receive the latest news, insights, and updates straight to your inbox. Welcome to our community! `; let selectedSubscriptionsArray = selectedSubscriptionsString.split(','); let subscribedCategories = selectedSubscriptionsArray.map(subscription => subscription.split('_')[0]); let subscribedCategoriesString = subscribedCategories.join(', '); subscribedmodal.innerHTML = subscribedPopupModal; if (document.getElementById('selectidname')) { document.getElementById('selectidname').textContent = subscribedCategoriesString; } document.querySelector('#subscribe-modal-design .modal').style.display = 'none'; subscribedmodal.style.display = 'block'; subscribedmodal.classList.remove('hide'); subscribedmodal.classList.add('show'); document.getElementById('subscribe_' + categoryid).style.display = 'none'; document.getElementById('unsubscribe_' + categoryid).style.display = 'block'; var showDownloadReport = document.getElementById('download_report'); if (showDownloadReport) { showDownloadReport.style.display = 'block'; } } } catch (e) { console.error('Error parsing response:', e); } }, }); } function closeModal(template_id) { var modalId = template_id; var modal = document.querySelector('#' + modalId); // Using querySelector to find the modal if (modal) { modal.classList.add('hide'); modal.classList.remove('show'); setTimeout(function() { modal.style.display = 'none'; }, 500); } else { console.warn('Modal not found:', modalId); } } function closeunsubscribemodal() { var unsubscribemodal = document.querySelector('.unsubscribed-popup-modal .modal'); if (unsubscribemodal) { unsubscribemodal.classList.add('hide'); unsubscribemodal.classList.remove('show'); } setTimeout(function() { unsubscribemodal.style.display = 'none'; }, 500); } function closesubscribemodal() { var subscribedmodal = document.querySelector('.subscribed-popup-modal .modal'); setTimeout(function() { subscribedmodal.style.display = 'none'; }, 500); if (subscribedmodal) { subscribedmodal.classList.add('hide'); subscribedmodal.classList.remove('show'); } } function withoutLoginClicked(withoutlogin_id) { localStorage.setItem('subscribe_without_Login', 'true'); localStorage.setItem('subscribe_clicked_id', withoutlogin_id); } document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { const subscribewithoutData = localStorage.getItem('subscribe_without_Login'); const subscribe_clicked_cat_id = localStorage.getItem('subscribe_clicked_id'); // Function to get cookies function getCookie(name) { let value = "; " + document.cookie; let parts = value.split("; " + name + "="); if (parts.length == 2) return parts.pop().split(";").shift(); } // Get user token from cookies const userToken = getCookie('user_token'); if (subscribewithoutData === 'true' && userToken) { // Call the modal function with the category ID subscribed_popupmodal(subscribe_clicked_cat_id); // Remove the flag and category ID from localStorage localStorage.removeItem('subscribe_without_Login'); localStorage.removeItem('subscribe_clicked_id'); } }); /************************** update susbcriber content **************************** */ function initializeSubscriptionButton() { var initialListItems = document.querySelectorAll('.subscription-options input[type="checkbox"]'); initialListItems.forEach(function(item) { console.log(item.checked, 'Initial Checkbox checked status'); }); var listItems = document.querySelectorAll('.subscription-options li'); if (listItems.length === 0) return; var anyActive = false; listItems.forEach(function(item) { var checkbox = item.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]'); if (checkbox) { if (checkbox.checked) { item.classList.add('active'); anyActive = true; // Set anyActive to true } else { item.classList.remove('active'); // Remove 'active' class if checkbox is unchecked } } }); } function updateButtonText(anyActive) { var subscribeButtonSpan = document.querySelector('.subscribe-submit .changeBtnText'); if (subscribeButtonSpan) { if (anyActive) { subscribeButtonSpan.textContent = 'Subscribe Now'; } else { subscribeButtonSpan.textContent = 'Unsubscribe'; } } } function updateSubscriptionButton() { var listItems = document.querySelectorAll('.subscription-options li'); if (listItems.length === 0) return; var anyActive = false; listItems.forEach(function(item) { var checkbox = item.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]'); if (checkbox) { if (checkbox.checked) { item.classList.add('active'); anyActive = true; // Set anyActive to true } else { item.classList.remove('active'); // Remove 'active' class if checkbox is unchecked } } }); // Update the button text based on whether any list item has the 'active' class updateButtonText(anyActive); } document.addEventListener('click', function(event) { var clickedItem = event.target.closest('.subscription-options li'); if (clickedItem) { var checkbox = clickedItem.querySelector('input[type="checkbox"]'); if (checkbox) { checkbox.checked = !checkbox.checked; updateSubscriptionButton(); } } }); FAQs Why is India’s CBDT investigating crypto income? The CBDT launched a probe into crypto income to combat tax evasion and money laundering, identifying widespread non-compliance where large crypto trades didn’t match income disclosures. How should crypto income be declared in India’s ITR? Crypto income should be declared separately from other capital gains in your ITR, typically using the dedicated Schedule VDA, and potentially an ITR-U if updating past returns. What is India’s crypto tax in 2025? India imposes a flat 30% tax on crypto gains and a 1% TDS on transfers over ₹10,000, with no loss set-off.

coinpedia 2025-06-14 15:50
XRP Lawsuit Could End Soon, Ripple Lawyer Predicts 70% Settlement Chance
The post XRP Lawsuit Could End Soon, Ripple Lawyer Predicts 70% Settlement Chance appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News After over four years of legal battle, the Ripple vs SEC case could finally be over. Both parties have recently filed a joint motion to settle. Ripple aims to unlock $125 million from escrow, $50 million would go to the SEC as a civil penalty, and $75 million would return to Ripple. The goal is to wrap it up without more delays or appeals. Deaton Says SEC Should Have Owned Up Attorney John Deaton says there is a 70% chance that Judge Analisa Torres will approve the deal. Deaton responded to a comment that accused him and Fred Rispoli of saying Ripple and the SEC should have overly praised Judge Torres in their filing. He clarified that he was not expecting any flattery, nor was he strongly criticizing the lawyers involved. Instead, he expected the SEC to acknowledge its past aggressive approach toward crypto, especially given past court rulings calling its actions “arbitrary and capricious” and even sanctioning SEC lawyers in the Debt Box case. In Ripple’s case, Judge Netburn said the SEC “lacked faithful allegiance to the law.” Deaton expected the filing to mention these issues and highlight upcoming crypto laws like the Clarity Act and Genius Act as reasons to settle and move forward. Filing Missed Key Points He also expected Ripple to point out how unfair it would be to face an injunction while the rest of the crypto industry moves toward clarity. He noted that companies like Circle would have an edge, as banks prefer working with firms that are not under a legal cloud. He said that the filing needed a stronger case to convince the judge to reverse a ruling she firmly believes in, and not just a few cases to justify it. He plans to provide an objective breakdown of both sides in his next update. Legal Experts Voice Mixed Views Attorney Fred Rispoli questioned why the injunction still matters if the SEC can simply grant Ripple a waiver to bypass it. Former SEC official Marc Fagel also raised concerns over the SEC’s latest filing, saying that its focus on elections and policy shifts is not a strong legal argument. Great post, John! One question I have had trouble trying to find an answer to—maybe you can address it tomorrow—is why the injunction ultimately matters at all. Meaning, SEC wanted the injunction, now it doesn’t. If it remains in place, doesn’t the SEC have the… — Fred Rispoli (@freddyriz) June 14, 2025 Judge to Grant Motion Anyway? Bill Morgan commented on the Ripple-SEC joint motion, noting that it doesn’t become more convincing the more you read it. But he thinks that the judge will likely approve the motion anyway.

coinpedia 2025-06-14 15:26
Trump's SEC scraps Gensler-era crypto regulation by enforcement proposals
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has withdrawn multiple anti-crypto rules proposed during the administration of its former chair, Gary Gensler. Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal shared the development on X, noting that Rule 3b-16 and several others are now gone. Rule 3b-16 is meant to expand the definition of an “exchange” to include DeFi protocols. This would have been possible due to the amendment defining an exchange to include “systems that offer the use of non-firm trading interest and communication protocols to bring together buyers and sellers of securities.” At the time, the proposal faced several pushbacks from the crypto community, with many calling for the regulator to remove the changes due to the impact it could have on crypto innovation. While the withdrawal is now happening under the new SEC Chair , Paul Atkins, talks of the SEC abandoning the rule have started since Gensler left the regulator. Former SEC acting chair Mark Uyeda noted a few months ago that he had advised the SEC staff to abandon part of the rule affecting crypto because the original proposal was meant to address alternative trading systems for the treasury markets. SEC withdraws crypto custody rules and others Meanwhile, the SEC also withdrew several other proposed rules , including those that are not necessarily impacting the crypto market. A major rescinded proposal was the Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets rule that increased custody requirements for crypto. Under the proposal, which would have applied to all investment advisers, firms must hold all client assets, including crypto, with a qualified custodian. This would have proven challenging for crypto investment firms, which usually hold cryptocurrencies in exchanges and wallets, entities that do not meet the criteria of qualified custodians. Uyeda was also involved in the efforts to withdraw this proposed rule, as he stated in a speech on March 17 that much of the public feedback the SEC got suggested concerns about the broad scope. Interestingly, he had earlier criticized some provisions in the rule as commissioner. He said then that the proposal could prevent an investment adviser from allocating funds to crypto. However, he still agreed with the need for rules to safeguard clients’ assets and supported the proposal. Beyond this, the regulator also withdrew 12 other proposed rules apart from these two. Some of these rules could impact crypto entities, including the proposed rules requiring entities to report positions of large security-based swaps and another on cybersecurity risk management and reporting for investment firms. Other rescinded proposals include Prohibition against Undue Influence over Chief Compliance Officers, Amendments to 14a-8, which is the Process for Including Shareholders Proposals in the Company’s Proxy Statements, and the Enhanced Disclosure for ESG investments. US regulators continue to shift away from regulation by enforcement Meanwhile, the latest round of SEC decisions moves the agency from its regulatory approach under Gensler. It continues the rollback of several anti-crypto policies implemented or about to be implemented under the previous administration. It is not just the SEC that has rescinded or withdrawn rules or guidances since President Donald Trump was sworn in. Other federal agencies, including the Federal Reserve and Office of Comptroller of Currency, have also taken similar decisions. Unsurprisingly, many have praised the changes as a welcome development as efforts to bring regulatory clarity to the crypto industry continue in Congress. While more progress appears to have been made on the GENIUS stablecoin act , the market structure legislation is also advancing in the House. Perhaps in a big sign of the changing times, the financial watchdog recently announced that former global head of institutional markets at Blockchain.com, Jamie Selway will become the Director of Trading and Markets, showing that the agency is bringing those with crypto industry expertise into its fold. KEY Difference Wire helps crypto brands break through and dominate headlines fast

Cryptopolitan 2025-06-14 14:22
US Crypto Regulation: White House Blocks Crucial Conflict Provision in CLARITY Act
BitcoinWorld US Crypto Regulation: White House Blocks Crucial Conflict Provision in CLARITY Act In a move that has caught the attention of the cryptocurrency world and political observers alike, the White House has reportedly signaled its intention to reject a specific provision within the proposed U.S. crypto market structure legislation, commonly known as the CLARITY Act . This particular section aimed to introduce guardrails designed to address potential crypto conflict of interest issues, especially concerning senior political figures. This development is significant for the future of US crypto regulation and raises questions about the path forward for comprehensive US crypto policy . What Was the Rejected Provision About? The provision in question sought to establish clearer rules and restrictions around how senior political figures might interact with or benefit from the cryptocurrency space, particularly after leaving office or in ways that could be perceived as profiting from their position or insider knowledge. The push for this guardrail reportedly gained traction due to concerns raised about past instances, specifically mentioning President Donald Trump’s engagement with and apparent promotion of crypto assets, which some critics viewed as potential profiteering. The core idea behind the provision was to enhance transparency and prevent situations where individuals with significant influence in government could use that influence, or information gained from it, to unfairly benefit financially from the volatile and often opaque crypto markets. Proponents argued that such measures are essential for maintaining public trust in both government and the nascent crypto industry. Why is Crypto Conflict of Interest a Concern? The rapid growth and unique nature of the crypto market present novel challenges for existing ethics rules designed for traditional finance or assets. Here are a few reasons why conflict of interest in the crypto space, particularly for public officials, is a hot topic: Market Volatility and Speculation: Crypto markets are known for extreme price swings. Knowledge of potential regulatory actions or government policies could provide an unfair advantage. Decentralization vs. Centralized Power: While crypto promotes decentralization, government officials hold centralized power that can significantly impact the market through legislation, enforcement, or public statements. Lack of Established Norms: Unlike stocks or real estate, the ethical boundaries for politicians holding, trading, or promoting specific cryptocurrencies are still being defined. Public Perception: Any hint of officials using their position for personal crypto gain can erode public confidence in both the government and the legitimacy of the crypto industry itself. The rejected provision aimed to tackle these points head-on, reflecting a desire among some lawmakers to preempt potential ethical pitfalls in the digital asset age. The White House Crypto Stance: Why the Rejection? According to reports citing sources familiar with the matter, the White House has decided against supporting the inclusion of this specific conflict-of-interest guardrail in the CLARITY Act. While the precise reasons for the administration’s stance haven’t been officially detailed in public statements regarding this specific provision, several possibilities could explain the decision: Sufficiency of Existing Ethics Rules: The administration might believe that current ethics laws and disclosure requirements for public officials are adequate to cover crypto assets, treating them similarly to other financial holdings. Scope and Implementation Challenges: Crafting legislation that effectively and fairly targets potential conflicts in the diverse crypto ecosystem is complex. Concerns might exist about the provision being overly broad, difficult to enforce, or potentially infringing on individuals’ rights. Political Considerations: The provision reportedly stemmed from concerns linked to a specific political figure (Donald Trump). The White House might wish to avoid including language perceived as targeting political opponents, or it could be part of broader negotiations around the bill’s passage. Focus on Broader Market Structure: The administration might prioritize the core objectives of the CLARITY Act – establishing clear regulatory frameworks for the crypto market – and view specific conflict-of-interest rules for individuals as a separate or less urgent matter. This decision highlights one of the many challenges in developing comprehensive US crypto regulation . Balancing the need for clear rules with practical implementation and political realities is a constant negotiation. What Does This Mean for US Crypto Policy and the CLARITY Act? The rejection of this provision doesn’t necessarily doom the entire CLARITY Act, but it certainly adds another layer to the ongoing debate surrounding the bill. Here are some potential implications: Bill’s Passage: The inclusion or exclusion of specific provisions can impact support for the bill among different factions in Congress. The rejection might make the bill more palatable to some but could alienate others who felt the conflict-of-interest issue was crucial. Future of Ethics Rules: If this specific provision is out, the debate over how to address potential crypto conflicts for officials isn’t over. Lawmakers might pursue alternative legislative avenues or rely more heavily on existing ethics bodies. Perception of Regulation: For proponents of strong regulation and ethical standards, the White House’s stance might be seen as a setback, suggesting a less stringent approach to potential conflicts involving powerful figures. Continued Uncertainty: The back-and-forth over specific provisions underscores the difficulty in reaching consensus on comprehensive US crypto policy , leaving the industry and investors navigating a complex and uncertain landscape. The CLARITY Act aims to provide much-needed regulatory clarity, but this development shows that even within efforts to bring order, significant disagreements persist on the details. Challenges in Crafting US Crypto Regulation This episode with the CLARITY Act provision illustrates several inherent challenges in developing effective US crypto regulation : Challenge Description Defining Scope Determining what constitutes a “crypto business” or a “conflict” in a rapidly evolving digital space. Political Divides Significant disagreements exist between parties (and even within parties) on how crypto should be regulated. Balancing Innovation & Protection Creating rules that protect consumers and ensure market integrity without stifling technological advancement. Jurisdictional Issues Deciding which regulatory bodies (SEC, CFTC, etc.) have authority over different aspects of crypto. The debate over the conflict-of-interest provision is a microcosm of these broader challenges. It touches upon political motivations, the difficulty of applying old rules to new tech, and differing views on the level of scrutiny needed for those in power. Conclusion: The Ongoing Saga of US Crypto Policy The White House’s reported decision to reject the conflict-of-interest guardrail in the CLARITY Act is a notable twist in the ongoing effort to establish clear US crypto regulation . While the provision specifically addressed concerns like those related to President Trump’s crypto activities, its rejection highlights the broader complexities and political hurdles involved in crafting comprehensive US crypto policy . This development means that the specific ethical questions surrounding senior political figures and their potential crypto conflict of interest will likely remain a point of discussion, possibly to be addressed in future legislation or through other means. The path to a settled regulatory framework for the U.S. crypto market continues to be a challenging one, marked by debates over scope, enforcement, and the fundamental principles that should govern digital assets in the nation. As lawmakers and the administration continue to grapple with these issues, stakeholders in the crypto industry and the public will be watching closely to see how the final shape of US crypto regulation emerges, and whether future attempts will be made to address the ethical considerations raised by the rejected provision. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping US crypto policy. This post US Crypto Regulation: White House Blocks Crucial Conflict Provision in CLARITY Act first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team

Bitcoin World 2025-06-14 14:10
Unlocking Europe: Coinbase & Gemini Poised for Crucial EU Crypto Licenses
BitcoinWorld Unlocking Europe: Coinbase & Gemini Poised for Crucial EU Crypto Licenses The European Union (EU) market represents a significant opportunity for global cryptocurrency platforms. Recent reports suggest that two major U.S.-based crypto exchanges, Coinbase and Gemini, are on the verge of securing crucial EU crypto licenses . This development signals a major step for these platforms in expanding their reach across the 27-nation bloc under the new Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). Why Are Coinbase and Gemini Pursuing EU Crypto Licenses? Operating legally and compliantly is paramount for cryptocurrency exchanges seeking long-term sustainability and growth, especially in established financial markets like Europe. The EU, with its unified market and substantial user base, presents a lucrative target. However, navigating the regulatory landscape has historically been complex, with differing rules across member states. The introduction of MiCA regulation EU aims to harmonize these rules, creating a clearer framework for crypto asset service providers (CASPs). For exchanges like Coinbase and Gemini, obtaining a license under MiCA is not just about market access; it’s about building trust, offering services legally, and ensuring consumer protection across the entire region. Securing an EU crypto license from one member state allows a firm to ‘passport’ its services, meaning it can operate across all other EU countries without needing separate licenses in each one. This ‘one-stop shop’ approach is a game-changer for international firms. Coinbase EU License and Gemini EU License: The Path Under MiCA Sources familiar with the matter have indicated that both Coinbase and Gemini are likely candidates to receive their initial EU licenses soon. Specifically, Reuters reported that Gemini is expected to secure its first license in Malta, while Coinbase is looking towards Luxembourg for its initial approval. This strategic approach – obtaining a license in one jurisdiction with a clear regulatory stance and then passporting – is a common tactic under MiCA. Malta has positioned itself as a welcoming jurisdiction for crypto businesses, while Luxembourg is a well-established financial hub within the EU. Securing a Coinbase EU license and a Gemini EU license from these respective countries would unlock the broader European market for their services, including trading, custody, and potentially other crypto-related offerings. For users in Europe, this could mean increased access to services from these major global players, potentially leading to more competitive fees, a wider range of assets, and enhanced security features offered by established platforms. Understanding the MiCA Regulation EU Framework MiCA is a landmark piece of legislation designed to provide legal certainty for crypto assets and related activities within the EU. It covers various aspects, including: Licensing: Requiring CASPs (like exchanges) to obtain authorization. Consumer Protection: Setting rules around transparency, disclosure, and investor rights. Market Integrity: Preventing market abuse and manipulation. Stablecoins: Establishing specific rules for stablecoins and e-money tokens. Passporting: Allowing firms licensed in one member state to operate across the EU. The regulation took effect in stages starting in 2023, with most key provisions becoming applicable in late 2024. The push by major crypto exchanges Europe -wide to secure licenses reflects the imminent full implementation of MiCA’s requirements. The Challenge of Regulatory Divergence While MiCA aims for harmonization, the Reuters report highlights a crucial challenge: a growing divergence among national regulators within the EU regarding the pace and criteria for regulatory approval. Even with a unified framework, the interpretation, application, and speed of processing license applications can vary significantly from one country to another. This divergence can create uncertainty and potential delays for firms like Coinbase and Gemini navigating the licensing process. Factors contributing to this might include: Different levels of experience or resources within national regulatory bodies. Variations in how specific MiCA provisions are interpreted locally. National specificities or priorities related to financial stability or consumer protection. Despite these variations, the underlying goal of MiCA is to ensure a consistent standard of regulation across the bloc, ultimately benefiting both businesses and consumers by creating a more predictable environment for crypto exchanges Europe relies on. What Does This Mean for Crypto Exchanges in Europe? The potential entry of Coinbase and Gemini, two of the world’s largest crypto exchanges, operating under a unified MiCA license, could significantly impact the European crypto market. It would likely increase competition among existing European players and provide EU users with more choices from globally recognized brands. For Coinbase and Gemini, obtaining an EU crypto license represents access to a vast, unified market of over 400 million people. This expansion is critical for their global growth strategies, especially as they navigate regulatory environments in other parts of the world. This development also underscores the increasing mainstream acceptance and regulatory maturation of the crypto industry in major economic blocs. As more large players secure licenses, it could pave the way for further institutional adoption and broader integration of crypto assets into the European financial ecosystem. Conclusion: A New Era for Crypto in the EU The anticipated approval of Coinbase EU license and Gemini EU license under the MiCA framework marks a pivotal moment for the cryptocurrency industry in Europe. While challenges like regulatory divergence persist, the overarching trend is towards greater clarity, compliance, and market access. This move by major U.S. exchanges highlights the growing importance of the EU market and the transformative potential of the MiCA regulation in creating a harmonized and regulated environment for crypto exchanges Europe -wide. As these platforms establish their presence, it promises to bring more options and potentially greater confidence for users engaging with digital assets across the continent. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends and regulatory developments, explore our articles on key developments shaping the future of crypto exchanges Europe and beyond. This post Unlocking Europe: Coinbase & Gemini Poised for Crucial EU Crypto Licenses first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team

Bitcoin World 2025-06-14 13:40
Crucial GENIUS Act Poised to Become First Bipartisan Legislation in Years: David Sacks
BitcoinWorld Crucial GENIUS Act Poised to Become First Bipartisan Legislation in Years: David Sacks In the often-contentious landscape of U.S. politics, finding common ground can seem like a rare event. Yet, a potential breakthrough is on the horizon, specifically within the realm of digital assets. According to insights shared by White House crypto czar David Sacks, the GENIUS Act , legislation focused on stablecoin regulation , is emerging as a significant contender to become the first piece of truly bipartisan legislation to pass through the U.S. Congress in years. This development is particularly noteworthy for the cryptocurrency industry, which has long sought clear regulatory frameworks. What is the GENIUS Act and Why Does Stablecoin Regulation Matter? The GENIUS Act (an acronym that likely stands for something specific within the legislative text, though its full name isn’t commonly cited) represents a concentrated effort to establish rules for stablecoins. Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a stable value, typically pegged to a fiat currency like the U.S. dollar. They are crucial for the functioning of the broader crypto market, facilitating trading, lending, and payments. Effective stablecoin regulation is seen by many, including policymakers and industry participants, as essential for several reasons: Financial Stability: Ensuring stablecoins are backed appropriately and managed transparently can mitigate risks to the traditional financial system. Consumer Protection: Clear rules can protect users from potential fraud, mismanagement, or the collapse of stablecoin issuers. Market Integrity: Regulation can foster trust and encourage wider adoption of stablecoins for legitimate purposes. Preventing Illicit Finance: Establishing frameworks can help prevent stablecoins from being used for money laundering or other illegal activities. The push for the GENIUS Act underscores a growing recognition in Washington D.C. that ignoring digital assets is no longer an option. The proposed legislation aims to provide clarity on how stablecoins should be issued, managed, and supervised. David Sacks’ Perspective on Bipartisan Legislation David Sacks , a prominent figure often associated with discussions around crypto policy and venture capital, highlighted the potential of the GENIUS Act in a recent statement. His observation, shared via Cointelegraph on X, points to the unique position this bill holds in the current political climate. The fact that it is being discussed as potentially the first piece of significant bipartisan legislation to pass in a long time speaks volumes about the perceived urgency and potential consensus surrounding stablecoin regulation . Why is bipartisan legislation so rare and why is its potential passage significant? In recent years, political divisions have often led to legislative gridlock, making it difficult for major bills to gain traction and pass through both the House and the Senate with support from both Democrats and Republicans. A bill passing with bipartisan backing suggests: There is a shared understanding across the political spectrum regarding the need for action. Compromises have likely been made to address concerns from both sides. The resulting law may be more robust and have broader support, potentially leading to more stable policy long-term. For the crypto industry, David Sacks’ remarks offer a glimmer of hope that a functional regulatory framework, supported by both major parties, could finally materialize, ending some of the current uncertainty. The Crucial US Senate Crypto Vote on June 17 The GENIUS Act is reportedly up for a final vote in the US Senate crypto discussions on June 17. This date marks a critical moment for the legislation and for the future of stablecoin regulation in the United States. A successful vote would move the bill closer to becoming law, potentially setting a precedent for how other digital asset classes might be regulated in the future. Market participants, policymakers, and crypto enthusiasts are watching the US Senate crypto proceedings closely. The outcome of this vote will signal whether Congress is ready to provide the regulatory clarity that the industry has been advocating for. It will also test the willingness of politicians from opposing parties to work together on complex, emerging technologies. Potential Benefits and Challenges of the GENIUS Act While the prospect of bipartisan legislation is positive, the specifics of the GENIUS Act are what will ultimately determine its impact. Based on the goal of stablecoin regulation , potential benefits could include: Increased institutional adoption of stablecoins due to regulatory certainty. Greater innovation within a clear legal framework. Enhanced trust and confidence among consumers and businesses using stablecoins. Strengthening the U.S. position in the global digital asset landscape. However, challenges and potential drawbacks also exist: The specific requirements of the regulation could be overly burdensome for smaller stablecoin issuers. Defining which entities fall under the regulation’s scope could be complex. Balancing innovation with necessary safeguards is a delicate act. The bill’s passage is not guaranteed, despite the positive outlook shared by figures like David Sacks . The details hammered out in the legislative process, and the outcome of the US Senate crypto vote, will reveal how these potential benefits and challenges are addressed. Actionable Insights and What to Watch For For anyone interested in the crypto space, particularly stablecoin regulation , the upcoming period is critical. Here are some actionable insights: Monitor the US Senate Crypto Vote: Keep a close eye on news regarding the vote scheduled for June 17. The outcome will be the most immediate indicator of the GENIUS Act’s fate. Understand the Details: If the bill progresses, delve into the specifics of the legislation. How does it define stablecoins? What are the requirements for issuers? Which regulators are involved? Assess the Impact: Consider how the regulation might affect different types of stablecoins, decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols that use stablecoins, and the broader crypto market. Follow Bipartisan Developments: The potential passage of this bill as bipartisan legislation could set a precedent. Watch if this signals a shift in how Congress approaches crypto policy overall. Listen to Experts: Pay attention to analysis from industry experts, legal scholars, and policymakers like David Sacks to understand the nuances and implications. Conclusion: A Potential Turning Point for US Stablecoin Regulation The prospect of the GENIUS Act passing as significant bipartisan legislation , as highlighted by David Sacks , represents a potential turning point for stablecoin regulation in the United States. With a crucial vote approaching in the US Senate crypto discussions on June 17, the coming days are vital. While challenges remain, the possibility of Congress finding common ground on this critical aspect of digital finance offers hope for greater clarity and stability in the market. The outcome will not only shape the future of stablecoins but could also signal a new era of congressional engagement with the crypto industry. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoin institutional adoption. This post Crucial GENIUS Act Poised to Become First Bipartisan Legislation in Years: David Sacks first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team

Bitcoin World 2025-06-14 13:30
Crucial AI Safety: New York Passes Landmark Bill Targeting Frontier AI Labs
BitcoinWorld Crucial AI Safety: New York Passes Landmark Bill Targeting Frontier AI Labs In a move resonating across the tech world, New York state lawmakers have taken a significant step toward addressing the potential risks posed by advanced artificial intelligence. This development is particularly relevant to the cryptocurrency and blockchain community, which often intersects with cutting-edge technology and its regulatory landscape. The recently passed bill, known as the RAISE Act, aims to establish guardrails around powerful frontier AI models developed by major players like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic. What is the New York AI Bill All About? The core purpose of the New York AI bill is to prevent future disaster scenarios potentially fueled by advanced AI systems. The bill specifically defines a disaster as an event causing death or injury to more than 100 people, or resulting in over $1 billion in damages. This focus on tangible, high-impact harm distinguishes the bill’s scope. The passage of the RAISE Act is seen as a notable victory for the AI safety movement. This group, which includes prominent figures like Nobel laureate Geoffrey Hinton and AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio, advocates for prioritizing caution and safety measures as AI technology rapidly advances. Their support highlights the bill’s alignment with calls from leading researchers for responsible AI development. Boosting Transparency Among Leading AI Labs A key component of the RAISE Act is its requirement for enhanced transparency from major AI labs . Should the bill be signed into law by Governor Kathy Hochul, it would mandate that the world’s largest AI companies publish detailed safety and security reports on their frontier models. This would be America’s first set of legally required transparency standards for such advanced AI. The bill also includes provisions requiring these companies to report safety incidents. This could involve disclosing concerning behaviors exhibited by an AI model or reporting instances of bad actors attempting to steal or misuse an AI system. Failure to meet these standards could result in significant civil penalties, potentially up to $30 million, enforceable by the New York Attorney General. Comparing New York’s Approach to Previous AI Regulation Efforts The RAISE Act shares many goals and provisions with California’s earlier attempt at AI regulation , SB 1047, which ultimately faced a veto. However, sponsors of the New York bill, like state Senator Andrew Gounardes, emphasize that they deliberately designed the RAISE Act to avoid stifling innovation, particularly among startups and academic researchers. This was a common criticism leveled against the California bill. Senator Gounardes noted the urgency of implementing safeguards, stating, “The window to put in place guardrails is rapidly shrinking given how fast this technology is evolving.” He added that even experts familiar with AI express alarm about the likelihood of these risks, underscoring the motivation behind the bill. Addressing Industry Concerns and the Scope of the Bill The RAISE Act is specifically designed to regulate the world’s largest companies whose AI models were trained using more than $100 million in computing resources and are available to New York residents. This includes tech giants based both domestically and internationally, such as OpenAI, Google, DeepSeek, and Alibaba. Despite this focused approach, the bill has faced pushback from Silicon Valley. New York state Assemblymember Alex Bores, a co-sponsor, acknowledged this resistance but maintained that the bill would not hinder innovation. Even Anthropic, an AI safety focused company, expressed some reservations, with co-founder Jack Clark noting concerns that the bill might be too broad and potentially impact smaller companies, a criticism Senator Gounardes disputed, reiterating the bill’s narrow focus on large entities. Another common concern raised, similar to debates around European tech regulations, is that AI model developers might simply choose not to offer their most advanced models in New York. Assemblymember Bores countered this, suggesting the regulatory burden is light enough that withdrawing from the state wouldn’t be economically justified, especially given New York’s significant GDP. He expressed confidence that while there might be “political pettiness,” there are no strong economic reasons for companies to withhold their services from New York residents. The Path Forward for the RAISE Act With passage in the state legislature, the RAISE Act now awaits review by New York Governor Kathy Hochul. She has several options: signing it into law, sending it back for potential amendments, or vetoing it. The tech and safety communities will be closely watching her decision, as signing it would make New York the first state in America with legally mandated transparency standards specifically for advanced AI labs . Summary: A Step Towards Accountable AI The passage of the RAISE Act in New York marks a significant legislative effort to proactively address the potential catastrophic risks associated with powerful frontier AI models. By focusing on transparency, incident reporting, and civil penalties for the largest AI labs , the bill aims to establish a framework for accountability. While facing industry pushback and comparisons to previous regulatory attempts, sponsors argue the bill is narrowly tailored to promote AI safety without stifling innovation, particularly for smaller entities. The fate of this potentially landmark AI regulation now rests with the Governor. To learn more about the latest AI regulation trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI policy . This post Crucial AI Safety: New York Passes Landmark Bill Targeting Frontier AI Labs first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team

Bitcoin World 2025-06-14 12:20
CBDT probes crypto tax evasion in India
India’s Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has launched an investigation into unaccounted crypto incomes among traders in the country. According to the agency, they are looking into possible tax evasion and money laundering through the use of digital assets. The CBDT stated that there is a likelihood that residents in the country have been laundering unaccounted income through digital assets, naming avenues like investments in high-risk digital assets and other aspects. The tax agency is presently looking into and verifying individuals and entities it believes are connected to the use of high-risk virtual digital assets (VDAs) and appear to have failed to comply with key provisions in the Income Tax Act, 1961. India’s CBDT set to investigate cases of unaccounted crypto incomes According to officials familiar with the matter, these investigations are majorly linked to individuals and firms that have either failed to disclose their digital asset income or incorrectly filed out their tax filings. Under Section 115BBH of the Income Tax Act, introduced in the Finance Act, 2022, income from transfers of VDAs is taxed at a flat rate of 30%, plus applicable surcharge and cess. The law forbids deductions of any expenses except for the cost of acquisition, disallowing set-off or carry forward of losses from VDA transactions. Government data analytics has also shown widespread non-compliance with the rule, causing the CBDT to launch a full investigation into residents who are involved. The data showed that a significant number of taxpayers are either refusing to report digital asset gains in the designated schedule VDA of their income tax returns (ITR), or paying tax at a low rate while incorrectly claiming benefits such as cost indexation. The CBDT has also matched ITR filings with TDS data submitted by Virtual Assets Service Providers (VASPs), who are commonly known as crypto exchanges. According to officials, it was the discrepancies in the information provided by both agencies that have led to a country-wide scrutiny of unaccounted crypto incomes. Taxpayers found defaulting could be subject to further verification or scrutiny under the law. Unaccounted crypto income defaulters to face consequences Over the last few weeks, the board mentioned that it has alerted thousands of individuals and firms it believes are involved, calling them “high-risk defaulters.” The agency has also urged them to review and, if necessary, update their ITR information to accurately reflect income from their VDA transactions. The development is coming off the back of the ongoing push by the CBDT to promote voluntary compliance in these activities. The agency is using its Non-intrusive Usage of Data to Guide and Enable taxpayers (NUDGE) program, under its “Trust Taxpayers First” philosophy. This is the third NUDGE campaign that the department has initiated in the last six months, with previous efforts focusing on the disclosures of foreign assets and the withdrawal of ineligible deductions claimed under Section 80GGC. This latest development comes off the back of a recent update by the Reserve Bank of India where it maintained its stance on digital assets. The bank was quick to make the update through its governor Sanjay Malhotra, which came after the Supreme Court urged the country to look into crypto regulations. “RBI has maintained a consistent stance on this issue. A govt committee is currently examining the matter. We remain concerned about the potential risks crypto poses to financial instability and monetary policy,” Malhotra said in a press briefing. Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites

Cryptopolitan 2025-06-14 11:20
EU Crypto Rules Spark Backlash Over Fast-Track Licenses
The post EU Crypto Rules Spark Backlash Over Fast-Track Licenses appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News As Europe rolls out its new MiCA rules, major crypto companies are lining up to get licensed and operate across the EU. But some regulators are worried that things are moving too fast. According to Reuters , Gemini, the crypto platform founded by billionaire twins Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, is about to receive a license in Malta, the EU’s smallest country. This would give them the green light to operate across all 27 member states. This comes shortly after Malta approved licenses for OKX and Crypto.com, just weeks after MiCA came into effect. Malta’s Fast-Track Approvals Face Scrutiny Malta’s fast approvals are raising eyebrows among EU regulators, especially under the watch of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). France’s AMF has warned that weak oversight could lead to a “race to the bottom.” One official even raised concerns over whether countries with smaller regulatory teams, like Malta, can provide adequate oversight. ESMA is now reviewing Malta’s process and is expected to release a report soon. In response, Malta’s regulator said that it has issued four licenses so far, and credited its speed to its past experience and the “in-depth understanding acquired over the years.” Malta’s regulator said it follows strict anti-money laundering rules. OKX also called the process rigorous and said that compliance is a top priority. Coinbase Eyes Luxembourg License Elsewhere, Luxembourg is soon expected to approve a license for Coinbase, the first U.S. crypto firm in the S&P 500. While its team there may be small, Coinbase has 200 staff in Europe, and it plans to hire 20 more in Luxembourg by the end of the year. Luxembourg pushed back on claims that it is being too lenient on crypto. It suggested that other countries might just be trying to win over crypto firms. Notably, Coinbase’s move is seen as a setback for Ireland, whose central bank once compared crypto to a Ponzi scheme. EU Split on MiCA Enforcement At the centre of the issue is keeping the multi-trillion-dollar crypto market in check. MiCA is designed to bring crypto under the same regulatory standards as traditional finance, but if countries apply the rules differently, it could weaken MiCA’s overall impact. Countries are still divided in the EU over how to enforce crypto rules. There are ongoing talks about giving more power to ESMA. ESMA’s chief Verena Ross wants stronger oversight, but some countries are hesitant to increase their authority. How these early licenses are handled will likely set the tone for how the EU balances crypto growth and investor protection going forward.

coinpedia 2025-06-14 08:15
Coinbase Rallies Behind 2 Landmark Crypto Bills—52M US Owners Await Congress
Coinbase’s CEO is driving urgent action behind two landmark crypto bills that promise regulatory clarity, investor protection, and explosive growth for America’s digital asset future. Coinbase Urges Legislative Action on 2 Crypto Bills: ’52 Million American Crypto Owners Are Counting on It’ Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase (Nasdaq: COIN) renewed its call for Congress to establish clear

Bitcoin.com 2025-06-14 05:45
Ethereum Foundation’s Bold Move: $500K Boosts Tornado Cash Founder Roman Storm’s Defense
BitcoinWorld Ethereum Foundation’s Bold Move: $500K Boosts Tornado Cash Founder Roman Storm’s Defense In a move that has sent ripples across the cryptocurrency world, the Ethereum Foundation recently announced a significant donation to support the legal defense of Roman Storm, a founder and developer behind the controversial privacy mixer, Tornado Cash. This isn’t just a simple donation; it’s a powerful statement from one of the most influential organizations in the Ethereum ecosystem, underscoring the high stakes involved in the ongoing legal battles facing developers in the crypto space, particularly those working on tools designed to enhance crypto privacy . Why is the Ethereum Foundation Stepping Up for Roman Storm ? The Ethereum Foundation confirmed it is contributing $500,000 towards the legal costs for Roman Storm. This substantial sum highlights the perceived importance of his case, not just for Storm himself, but for the broader principles the Foundation believes are at stake. In their statement, the Foundation emphasized that “privacy is normal” and, crucially, that “writing code is not a crime.” This position aligns with a long-held view within the crypto and open-source communities that code is a form of speech and that developers should not be held criminally liable for how others choose to use the tools they create. The Foundation’s financial support signals a commitment to defending developers whose work touches upon sensitive areas like privacy, especially when facing legal challenges from powerful entities like the U.S. Department of Justice. What is Tornado Cash and Why the Controversy? To understand the context of the DOJ indictment and the Ethereum Foundation’s support, it’s essential to know what Tornado Cash is. Tornado Cash is a decentralized protocol designed to improve transaction privacy on the Ethereum network. It works by pooling together cryptocurrency from various users, mixing it, and then allowing users to withdraw the same amount (minus fees) to a new address. This process makes it significantly harder to trace the origin of funds. Here’s a simplified breakdown of how it generally works: Deposit: User A deposits ETH or another token into the Tornado Cash pool. Wait: User A waits for a period while other users also deposit and withdraw funds. Withdraw: User A withdraws the same amount of ETH to a completely new wallet address using a cryptographic proof (a ‘note’) from their original deposit. The controversy arises because while Tornado Cash can be used for legitimate privacy reasons (e.g., protecting financial history from public view, preventing tracking by advertisers or unwanted parties), it has also allegedly been used by malicious actors, including cybercriminals and entities sanctioned by the U.S. government, to launder illicit funds. This dual-use nature has placed it squarely in the crosshairs of regulators. Unpacking the DOJ Indictment : What Are the Charges Against Roman Storm ? Roman Storm was arrested and subsequently indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice in August 2023. The charges against him are serious and carry significant potential penalties. The indictment alleges three main counts: Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering: This charge alleges that Storm conspired with others to conduct financial transactions involving the proceeds of specified unlawful activities, knowing that the transactions were designed to conceal the nature, source, or ownership of the funds. Conspiracy to Operate an Unlicensed Money Transmitting Business: The DOJ alleges that Tornado Cash operated as a money transmitting business without obtaining the necessary licenses, and Storm was involved in this operation. Conspiracy to Violate Sanctions Laws: This charge is particularly sensitive, alleging that Storm conspired to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by facilitating transactions for sanctioned entities, notably the North Korean cybercrime group Lazarus Group, which the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Tornado Cash for allegedly enabling. The DOJ’s case appears to focus not just on the existence of the tool, but on Storm’s alleged involvement in its operation, maintenance, and alleged knowledge or willful blindness regarding its use by illicit actors. This distinguishes it from merely writing and publishing code, a point the defense and its supporters, including the Ethereum Foundation, are likely to contest vigorously. The Bigger Picture: Crypto Privacy Under Fire? The case against Roman Storm and the subsequent support from the Ethereum Foundation highlight a fundamental tension at the heart of the crypto space: the desire for privacy and anonymity versus the demands of financial regulation aimed at preventing money laundering and sanctions evasion. Blockchain technology is inherently transparent, making transaction histories publicly viewable. Privacy tools like Tornado Cash were developed precisely to counter this transparency for users who value financial confidentiality. Proponents of privacy tools argue that privacy is a fundamental right and necessary for various legitimate activities, such as protecting sensitive business transactions, preventing stalking or harassment based on public financial data, or simply maintaining personal financial confidentiality in a world where data is increasingly exploited. Regulators, on the other hand, view tools that obfuscate transaction origins as significant risks that can be exploited by criminals, terrorists, and sanctioned regimes to move illicit funds undetected. They argue that the need to combat serious financial crime outweighs the general desire for privacy in this context. The legal battle facing Storm could set important precedents regarding the legal liability of developers who create decentralized, open-source software. If developers can be held responsible for the illicit actions of users of their tools, even if they have no direct control over the usage, it could have a chilling effect on innovation and the development of privacy-enhancing technologies in the crypto space and beyond. What Does This Mean for Developers and Users? The DOJ indictment and the subsequent legal proceedings against Roman Storm serve as a stark reminder of the legal risks associated with developing and using certain types of crypto software, particularly those focused on privacy or facilitating peer-to-peer transactions without intermediaries. For developers, this case underscores the importance of understanding the regulatory landscape and potential legal liabilities associated with their projects. While the “code is speech” argument is a strong defense within the community, its acceptance in traditional legal systems is still being tested. Building in compliance features where possible or clearly disclaiming responsibility for user actions might become even more crucial, though the decentralized nature of many projects makes this complex. For users, the case highlights the risks associated with using privacy tools that are under regulatory scrutiny. While using such tools might be legal in some jurisdictions or for certain purposes, their association with illicit activities and the regulatory crackdown can lead to assets being frozen or other legal consequences. Ultimately, the outcome of the case against Roman Storm, supported by the Ethereum Foundation ‘s significant contribution, will be closely watched by the entire crypto community. It represents a critical juncture in the ongoing debate about the balance between financial privacy, regulatory control, and the freedom to develop open-source technology. To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum price action. This post Ethereum Foundation’s Bold Move: $500K Boosts Tornado Cash Founder Roman Storm’s Defense first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team

Bitcoin World 2025-06-14 05:30
SEC Crypto Appointments: Pivotal Shift for Digital Asset Regulation in the US
BitcoinWorld SEC Crypto Appointments: Pivotal Shift for Digital Asset Regulation in the US Big news from Washington D.C. is buzzing through the cryptocurrency world! The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has just announced some key personnel changes that could potentially reshape the landscape for digital assets in the United States. These appointments are particularly noteworthy because they include individuals with direct experience in the crypto sector, sparking hope for a more informed and perhaps even a more accommodating regulatory approach. Understanding the Significance of SEC Crypto Appointments Why are SEC crypto appointments such a big deal? Well, the SEC plays a critical role in overseeing financial markets, including how cryptocurrencies and related products are classified, traded, and offered to the public. Their decisions have a massive impact on everything from whether a spot Bitcoin ETF gets approved to how crypto platforms operate. For years, the industry has called for clearer rules, and changes in leadership can often signal a shift in regulatory priorities and perspectives. The recent announcement highlights the appointment of four senior officials, and what caught the eye of many industry observers is that two of these individuals bring experience specifically relevant to the burgeoning world of digital assets . Jamie Selway: Stepping in as the new director of the Division of Trading and Markets, effective June 17th. This division oversees trading venues like exchanges and brokers – areas directly relevant to how cryptocurrencies are bought and sold. Brian Daly: Taking the helm as the new director of the Division of Investment Management, starting July 8th. This division is crucial for investment products, including funds and ETFs, which are major vehicles for institutional and retail investment in crypto. Their backgrounds in the digital asset space suggest that the SEC is bringing in expertise that understands the nuances and complexities of this technology and market. This move has been interpreted by publications like The Block as a potential indicator that SEC leadership, possibly under Chairman Paul Atkins, might be leaning towards a more pragmatic or even ‘crypto-friendly’ stance compared to previous approaches. What These SEC Digital Assets Appointments Could Mean The addition of officials with digital asset experience could lead to several potential outcomes for the market and participants. While it’s too early to make definitive predictions, here are some possibilities: Increased Understanding: Officials with direct experience might better grasp the technology, market structures, and potential benefits of digital assets, leading to more informed rulemaking. Potential for Clearer Guidance: Their insights could contribute to developing clearer regulatory frameworks, reducing uncertainty that has long plagued the industry. Review of Existing Stances: It’s possible that previous regulatory positions on certain tokens or activities could be revisited with a fresh perspective. Smoother Process for New Products: A deeper understanding within the SEC could potentially streamline the review process for new crypto-related financial products, such as various types of ETFs or investment funds. However, it’s important to temper expectations. The SEC is a large institution, and regulatory processes are complex and often slow. These appointments are significant, but they are just one piece of the puzzle. The overall direction will depend on many factors, including the views of the Commissioners and the broader political and economic environment. The Future of Crypto Regulation US The landscape for crypto regulation US has been a major point of discussion and often frustration for the industry. The lack of a comprehensive, clear framework has been cited as a barrier to innovation and institutional adoption. Different agencies, like the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), have sometimes appeared to have overlapping or conflicting views on which assets fall under their jurisdiction. These new SEC officials could play a vital role in shaping the future of this regulation. Their experience could inform discussions around: How to classify different types of tokens (security vs. commodity vs. other). Appropriate consumer protection measures for crypto investors. Regulation of crypto exchanges and trading platforms. Oversight of stablecoins and decentralized finance (DeFi). The hope is that their appointments will contribute to a more collaborative and effective approach to developing rules that protect investors while allowing the digital asset space to innovate responsibly. Navigating Digital Asset Regulation: What Stakeholders Should Consider For businesses and investors in the crypto space, these appointments are a signal to pay close attention to upcoming SEC actions and statements. Here are some actionable insights: Stay Informed: Follow announcements and speeches from the SEC, particularly from the divisions led by the new officials. Engage Constructively: Industry participants should continue to engage with regulators, providing input and education on digital asset technologies and markets. Prepare for Potential Changes: While hoping for clearer rules, businesses should remain prepared for evolving regulatory requirements. Understand Divisional Roles: Recognize that the Division of Trading and Markets and the Division of Investment Management handle different aspects of the market, and changes in their leadership are relevant to specific types of crypto activities and products. These appointments represent a step towards potentially integrating more specialized knowledge into the regulatory body overseeing digital asset regulation . While the path forward still holds uncertainties, the inclusion of officials with relevant experience is a positive development for those seeking clarity and progress in the US crypto market. Concluding Thoughts: A New Era for SEC and Crypto? The appointment of two senior SEC officials with experience in the digital assets sector is a significant development that shouldn’t be overlooked. It suggests a potential evolution in how the regulatory body approaches the complex and rapidly changing world of cryptocurrency. While challenges remain in establishing a comprehensive crypto regulation US framework, bringing in expertise from the industry itself could pave the way for more informed, effective, and perhaps even favorable policies for digital assets moving forward. The coming months under the leadership of Jamie Selway and Brian Daly in their respective divisions will be closely watched by everyone invested in the future of finance. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping digital assets institutional adoption. This post SEC Crypto Appointments: Pivotal Shift for Digital Asset Regulation in the US first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team

Bitcoin World 2025-06-14 05:00

1 2 3 4 5 ... → Last